News

In response to the Danish Cartoons: I am not an Ape!

Reader's Voice | 2008-03-01 | 35 comments



Print Print article

ADVERT:

Sharif Hafez, university professor in Egypt, expresses here his view on the publications of caricatures of the prophet Mohamed in a newspaper in Denmark. He argues that there is a double standard in Europe when it comes to freedom of speech. This is according to Hafez frustrating above all for educated secular muslims who are losing ground to more radical muslim groupings.

 

 

In the beginning of this whole matter, I didn’t really care much about the entire issue of your cartoons, and I actually used to defend you, based on your secular standpoint, that I well know, since I have been born and raised in the West. However, and since you have republished the cartoons, as a reason, that I have found silly, I was internally forced to write, since I thought, now, you must understand the real message stemming from within the Muslim world.

Newspapers in the Denmark republished the “provocative” cartoons of prophet Mohamed because the cartoonist, Kurt Westergaard, was threatened by 3 extremist Muslims to be assassinated. Those 3 extremists where arrested.

But, rather than confront this issue through “civilized” means, you chose to provoke more than one billion people for the extremism of 3 people among that large amount.

You chose collective punishment of more than a "billion" of people, of which the majority would probably disagree on threats to kill, rather than dialogue! You chose collective punishment that we are used to, while watching Israel bomb a whole state, for the ills of some! You used a strategy used by imperialists and occupiers, to show how much a concept of "FREEDOM" is important to you, while the other´s FREEDOM is not as much important. Hence you must ask here, if that is really freedom or not?

It is good to know, that the Danish people who chose to do so, are among the most tolerable people in the world, who think that wearing the headscarf in Parliament poses no problems.

However, and on the other hand, they erased by publishing these ignorant cartoons human history. Since what might be the difference between middle age European warriors, before the Westphalia agreement or Nazi officers and what you did? You, a civilized country, chose to face extremism through extremism! So, is that a European lesson to be learned? Should I face crime through more crime? Should I face racism through more racism? Should I face fundamentalism through more fundamentalism? Well, I have to tell you, that this is the reason of war mongers, not civilized people and that is no FREEDOM!

How can a people, any people, risk their interest for a belief that is not really greatly attacked? You can publish against the oppression of any. You can publish as you wish. But we "begged" you not to show our sacred Prophet in a bad way. This man is THE most important man for us. This man is the greatest symbol for all Muslims! Do you think that freedom means to disrespect someone, so as to show you are free?

So, the Danes, don’t care about their interests within the Muslim world? The Germans, as their interior Minister made an announcement, thought to be ignorant at the beginning but then clarified, that his words were taken out of context, know well that the billions of dollars they get for selling their Mercedes and BMWs to the Muslim world, and the more vital interests, are more important than a "relative" concept of freedom!

Do you see it that way? Or are you planning to invade us, if we don’t agree with you, so to show us another version of operation “Freedom Iraq”? Well, that was the Bush administration´s definition of freedom, and Iraq is a clear picture today of anything but freedom! Can´t people in the Muslim world, just put up an internet site attacking your "sensible" symbols, since you do have sensible symbols that are forbidden to be attacked according to law? Of course they can, but I would not support that, since that would be the same as you do: reaction on the way to human disaster hindering world peace!

Politically speaking, I’m a follower of a symbol of peace: Mohamed Anwar El Sadat. He is a man who taught the world the meaning of peace, scarifying his life for millions of people to live without wars and blood.

However, what I see today and coming from YOU in the Denmark, is a call for a cultural war that might eventually turn to be a real war, where people lose their lives. Why? Will that be in defense of freedom then? Will that satisfy you at the time? I have to tell you here, that you are fulfilling the agenda of the ignorant "Clash of Civilization" which shows, that people, when they get civilized, turn into evils of war not angels of peace!

Through history, people have started fighting for something, to end up fighting for something else. That was the same thing, but it altered the original meaning through its evolution through time. President Gorbachev has taught us a great lesson in history, when he abandoned Soviet communism, since it turned through history to be a different thing, taking Soviet citizens towards deterioration. Sadat took a courages decision when he flew to Israel, since he saw that war with Israel would be a cycle that will never end. He saw the Jungle and not the tree. He saw a vision and not the picture. These decisions take much courage.

However, the question remains: Do you have the courage needed to stop publishing these cartoons, to respect the liberty, freedom and peace of the other, as well as YOU and by doing so, not endanger an inch of your freedom? Can you take the extra mile for coexistence, peace and understanding of differences between different people and cultures?

You are empowering radicalism, and make moderates like me and others, hide in the dark. You are radicalizing the Muslim world, and making a man like Bin Laden shout up loudly and say: "I told you!" If the attempt on Kurt Westergaard has failed, then you are inspiring attempts on all moderates in the Muslim world. However, these attempts will be successful at most, and these moderates will die, because of your own ill version of "FREEDOM"! How can one face terrorism and radicalism, while those, like you, who are supposed to be more open minded, don´t ask the vital questions to react?

What you defend is not the concept of freedom. It is the disrespect for more than a billion of people throughout the world. To tell you the truth, I have discovered that you are no better than Bin Laden or Bush! Either we believe in what you believe in or you will publish the cartoons! Like Bush: Either you are with us or you are not with us! You are committing a crime of “Terror of Thought”!

On the other hand, we don’t ask you to believe in Mohamed or Islam, but just show us respect needed, by not publishing these ignorant cartoons! However, we are supposed to be wrong and you right! I have learned in the West that one should respect differences of opinions, however you are proving that you have deceived me, teaching me something you, yourself, don´t believe in!

You didn’t even take the time, to ask a vital question: Do the majority of Muslims support those who threatened the cartoonist? Does the Majority of Muslims support the killing of anybody like that in reference to Theo van Gogh or threats to Salman Rushdie?

Well, even you never asked, I would like to tell you that the answer is: NO! We don’t support these terrorists! But you never cared to ask! Why? Why and you are that educated and a tolerant society? I don’t have the answer! However, you might give me an answer that I might consider, since I have learned not to react to opinions spontaneously, but after much thinking, especially when it comes to my freedom and more so, when it comes to the freedom of my beloved people and country!

From my experience and dealing with people from different cultures, being born and raised in the West (Germany) and learned in the USA, and traveling through many Western countries, including the Denmark in 1997 within what was known at the time as the "Copenhagen Initiative for Peace" with Israel, I can tell you with great confidence, that Easterners, including Muslims, are more open minded when it comes to foreigners!

I’d like you to ask the majority of people who have been to Muslim states on the way they were handled. Please publish the answers, because I know, they are in our favor, unless you ask chosen people!!! Now, let us see the other way around, and ask the opposite question. I myself have seen many ultra-nationalists in “West” Europe and in the United States, and more wonderful persons, that I keep friendship with till this moment.

If we just talk about the obvious agenda of the neo-cons in the United States, who have made a war against terror lose its meaning, to hunt down some of those Muslims held, who have nothing to do with the whole issue, and sexually abuse prisoners in Abu-Gharib or else, while in the same time calling with much confidence for Democracy, just as you are calling for freedom!

I won’t deny that there are bad people here in the Muslim world. But don’t tell me that you are all saints and angels either! Wherever you go, you will find bad or good, but you are still punishing us all, for the sake of "FREEDOM"! I can´t see your logic anymore!

Now, doesn’t Ahmadinejad have freedom to verbally attack the Holocaust, and say it never existed? Common now! You are defending the concept of freedom, so let him say whatever he wants! It is only freedom, that is interpreted according to YOUR definition not mine! Isn’t it?

Well, I honestly, don’t believe that is his freedom and I myself have many Jewish & Israeli friends whom I dearly respect, and who like me, are against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights and the Shebaa Farms. I know you in Europe, have a law against anti-Semitism.

However, let me tell you something new for you to learn. I’m no less Semite than the Jews. If you didn’t know, then that is important information for you here! You have attacked me with these cartoons, since I’m a Muslim too, and unlike you, I have read Islamic texts, and know that prophet Mohamed was not a war monger like Bin Laden, but a peacemaker, and those Muslim fundamental lunatics, don´t represent him! Therefore, you have shown disrespect to me!

Finally, you are defending the concept of Freedom. You stand against anyone who disrespects the Jews in concern to the Holocaust! You don’t want to retreat from publishing the cartoons which disrespect me as a Muslim! Okay! Then I have to tell you the final conclusion here:

You don’t see me equal to Jews, since you disrespect me, and respect them! You have read half a book of history and intentionally refused to read the rest! So, that simply means: YOU ARE RACISTS! I refuse to deal with racists, and therefore, despite being a moderate, and despite loving you, I have to defend my dignity and FREEDOM, since freedom is a relative concept!

Therefore I can’t go on writing, since you are people that deal according to double standards and have to apologize to the whole Muslim world and not publish these cartoons and make a similar law to that of anti-Semitism, for the Muslim symbols, since I’m not an ape but a human being too!
 

----------------

Sharif Hafez

 

Sharif Hafez is an assistant professor of middle eastern politics and political islam in Giza, Egypt.

Readers' comments

2008-11-10 18:18 Fred from Oregon, USA wrote:
I must admit. At first I thought little, if nothing wrong with the cartoons, but Hafez makes a good point. What if they were cartoons showing Jews, like Moses, or Golda Meir, or Sharon, in this way? Would we call it anti-semitism? ...reminiscent of Nazi Germany or the Pogroms?
2008-11-09 17:52 antireligion wrote:
moslems must respect others right to despise and disrespect their perceived profet based on his actions as biographed in the quran. Also since islam is a law and teaches the way soceity is to be run it defines politics hence it can be ridiculed and critizied. Fun that most muslims predicts a war eventually coming from drawing pics of their guy...and its not a violent religion. Swingers,stheists and homoes have good reason to despise and fight against islams influence - and thats teir right
2008-11-01 07:30 UlfT wrote:
It´s unfortunate that Egypt, a land where women are married at age 14, pupils are beaten to death in school, women complain of constant harrasment, and people may be put in prison for completely private acts (like swingles) consider itself in a position to judge any freedom of speech or whatever... The author should visit the many kiosks in Cairo where you can find Mein Kampf, or derogatory literature, including cartoons about Jews, Christians, and whatever you want. Are these double standards?
2008-05-14 16:43 jesus wrote:
lancelot, you have the answer in your question my friend.. we arent living in the 15th century but the 21st !...its the age where freedom of thought, expression and lifestyle is paramount given so many races coexist... so its time muslims (atleast the extremists) get their act together, respect other religions the way they are and stop calling their western saviours (on whose aid their very lives run on) infidels.
2008-05-13 20:57 lancelot wrote:
Well Jesus, if you had lived in the 15th century you would say the same about christianity. "is something fundamentally wrong in christianity which makes christians vulnerable targets of provocative antisocial madmen". Were all christians in the 15th century madmen??
2008-05-13 20:49 jesus wrote:
tell me one muslim country which is doing well economically as well as socially i.e. where people live a fearless life with complete freedom of expression and thought... i believe there is something fundamentally wrong in islam which makes muslims vulnerable targets of provocative antisocial madmen.
2008-04-13 18:04 David Jonasson, Stockholm News wrote:
RE Hakan: Our publishing policy do not give us the right to review personal opinions or decide what´s true or not. Final considerations are governed by the Swedish law, who in this case don’t apply.
2008-04-13 12:27 Hakan wrote:
Dear mr moderatour of this diskusion, what this Zia Ul Haq write is terible lie and provoccasion.It impossible Prophet that ask some one kill one other person and say lie.Prophet of Allah was truth, morale, all-kind, and trutfull. and loved other persons. Is terible insult this and lie he writes, you must nevere post here. Therfor I ask to you remove this Zia Ul Haq form this list Dear Sir.
2008-04-05 22:15 BMurphy wrote:
I have seen many cartoons of the USA Leaders over the years and the people I belive in like Jesus, made into all kinds of filthy comment and drawings, in Moslem Newspapers all over the Middle East. You don´t see me killing or threatening people with death over a cartoon! Only the trouble makers who retain power by blinding thought with shouts and stir the masses make this an issue. Being a moderate does not make you a coward! Why don´t you stand up and fight back? Mainly because in every village I went to visit over there. One old "Holy Man" kept the rest of the people down and translated his faith as the only way to live. Even when it was not written or they had direction from others outside the village. That is why the USA has a seperation of Church and State! To keep sick minded people from leading thier people to ruin! One Person-One Vote. Kick the Religion out of your govenment and then you can start to be a modern people. Religion means people of peace not of hate, that believe in equal rights and the right to practice their faith the way they wish. It is silly to kill someone becasue they wish to worship their God their way and not the Village Religious Idiot Leader! Ranger515-Roger That!
2008-04-05 17:15 Zia Ul Haq wrote:
Imtiaz, you wrote: "Study of the Prophet Muhammad´s life proves he has always taught tolerance." Here is some study for you, from the original Islamic sources (Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 52:270-271): “The Prophet said, ‘Who is ready to kill Ashraf? (Ashraf was a Jewish poet who wrote against Muhammad.) He has said injurious things about Allah and His Apostle.’ Maslama got up saying, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like me to kill him?’ The Prophet replied, ‘Yes.’ Maslama said, ‘Then allow me to say what I like [a lie].’ Muhammad said, ‘I allow you.’ ”. Also, Najeeb Khan, you wrote: "I pray for them to think rationally about prophet Muhammad who is unparralelled in history whatsoever benchmarks one adopts." Here are my benchmarks: no one should torture another human being, under any circumstances. Do you agree? Now read: (from Sirat Rasul Allah: life of Allah´s Messenger) Tabari 8:122 and Ishaq:515 "The Prophet gave orders to Zubayr concerning Kinanah, saying, ‘Torture him until you root out and extract what he has.’ So Zubayr kindled a fire on Kinanah’s chest, twirling it with his firestick until Kinanah was near death. Then the Messenger gave him to Maslamah, who beheaded him." There is much more, this is only a tiny sample. I wonder, Imtiaz and Najeeb Khan, just what kind of lies have they told you about your prophet?
2008-03-23 18:54 Bernardino Telesio wrote:
reading the answer of prof. Sharif Afez.I agree whit him if says"I am not an Ape" but where he miss is that never the Islam doctrinally has wondered if the Danish "still are Apes" and only for this I believe too seriously inadequated the general reactions for the caricatures of the prophet Mohammed. I remember, when years ago, the Italian Institute of culture held a convention,on the three agees of the apocalipse(in which the third were believed the coming of Islam) of Gioacchino da Fiore,exactly here in Stockholm were,still are in the first, my natural reaction has been,roll on the ground with laughing.Of course I´m Roman Catholic,and of course I give a correct meaning to culture,religion, and civilization,much wider than only economy,But I deeply believe,as in the metaphysics of Tommaso Campanella,that tha man cannot feel directly the cold or the warm, but only himself modified by the cold or the warm,,in the same way the man cannot feel directly god, but only himself modified by god,,,so the Danish can feel God just a little and do not understand proprely how respect Mohammed, or Jesus
2008-03-14 12:35 Ghandi wrote:
Dear hp geissen, to "signal to every would-be blackmailer that they will not succeed and thus waste their energy on the wrong subject" states have created an invention called "LAW". And "in order to protect all" civilizations have invented a creation called "DIALOUGE"! However, WAR is easier than PEACE! It takes a human bsing to erect a building and a monster to destroy it! Where is the Danes in both? and where is Dr.Sharif?
2008-03-13 12:27 hp geissen wrote:
All this has nothing to do with "punishment". Neither did Christians succeed to become exempted from expressions of negative views, nor will Muslims succeed in such an attempt. It simply cannot be. It is well known that once you give in to pressures more pressures are to come. You have, then, sent an invitation to be molested. Thus, whatever the original publication may have pursued, the goal of the re-publications is neither punishment nor pressure (for what?), but a signal to every would-be blackmailer that they will not succeed and thus waste their energy on the wrong subject. I agree that some expressions of opinion may actually express bad manners, but that´s not the issue here. Maybe I repeat myself, but I refer to Jutta Limbach, now the president of the Goethe Institute, but back then the president of the German Federal Constitutional Court: Even stupid opinions (maybe you´ll read "bad-mannered") must be protected in order to protect all. The particular point here is "in order to protect all" (freedom). It referred to the acquittal of the sentence "All soldiers are paid killers", which understandably provoked an outcry no only of soldiers. It is as bad-mannered as you could wish (as an example for bad manners). But it is also an expression of opinion and thus free. And this is and will remain the measure, at least in Germany. I´m really not happy that so many people have been disturbed, but I don´t really see an effective alternative.
2008-03-10 13:30 Najeeb Khan wrote:
History, examination and investigation is a systematic way of dianosis of a patient by physcian.If symtems are visible then there is no need for taking pains of second and third steps. Cartoons depicts the shizopherenic mind set of denish media.I pray for hem to think rationally about prophet Muhammad who is unparralelled in history whatso ever benchmarks one adopts.
2008-03-10 10:37 Shahira wrote:
I agree with Imtiaz, and think also, that there is a GREAT decline in Western cultural approach, under the slogan of "culture", that represents no culture! It represents a will for cultural tyranny. The West envies the East, of its cultural magic, shown and spotlighted in every novel or film, whatever takes place in it. The West wants to stop this magic and ruin it, by showing a false shine by the Western culture, in the name of freedom! However, is that freedom? THAT IS THE QUESTION!
2008-03-09 22:26 Imtiaz wrote:
After 9/11 Muslims are tested by variety of political trials of media and language war. It is time for every one Muslim or non-Muslim to grow more culturally sensitive and sensible. Muslims are angry because cartoons are against their sanctity of belief in the personality of the prophet. Muslims are angry because they feel west is more sensitive owing to the result of advancements in knowledge and research in the west. I think at this point of the issue west has gone in a state of shaken confidence after 9/11. Study of the Prophet Muhammad´s life proves he has always taught tolerance. Cartoons can not bring harm to the Holiness of the prophet, it only brought anger in public and is a big question mark at the western approach. One must investigate and research the roots of new violence termed by me as ´Creative Frenzy´. The cartoonist has shown insensitivity to his professionalism first and insincerity to his audience along with some get-rich-quick fame. He is under the pressure of a media bubble, where he is successful in grabbing attention of Muslims all over the world. For Muslims, there is a big message to get ready for such attacks on their belief and as well as any who supports them. West has gone wild! Time for others to lead the torch of knowledge and wisdom.It is a moment in the life of Muslim historians to regain their lost glory a time to think forward and take the lead where west is inclined towards its deep slumber after a long wakeful watch.
2008-03-09 19:29 morshedi wrote:
i do agree with every single word you (Dr.sharif hafez)wrote ,they intend that they have a freedom but all i can see is that they only have range and anger and discremination with ISLAM as whole and muslims as well. like SAMUEL HANTENGTON said " there will be a clash of civilizations and it will turns on the other face whick is CLASH OF RELIGIONS and also said WEST AND THE REST ...all of this gather us tightly much more than anything else ever to defend our relegion and ofcourse our PROPHET " MOHAMMED "....
2008-03-06 11:57 kerolos kamal wrote:
Hi Ghandi, I didn´t mean what I think you understood. Religions are under the concept of choice, you believe in it or not but History isn´t like that. simply you refuse to believe that something hasn´t happened that doesn´t meant this thing didn´t happen because you didn´t accept it. you can accept or refuse any belief but you can´t change history.
2008-03-05 23:29 Sadat wrote:
lancelot you wrote:"And Sadat, is it to build brides to call the other side rascists and therefore refuse to talk to them as prof Hafez writes..?" What I understand of Dr. Sharif´s words, is that this is a symbol which he proved to be right. What you say is that if someone tells you are bad, you won´t discuss it with him, and rather stop communication with him? Look to what Anwar Sadat did? He went the "extra mile" and now there is peace between Egypt and Israel!
2008-03-05 16:53 lancelot wrote:
Gandhi you wrote "...do you know that a Copt is suing the Danes for republishing the Cartoons?" First I just wonder: Can you suit a whole people for something that a newspaper wrote? To what court will he suit those nasty danes? The Danish constitutional court? The European court of justice? The UN?? Or do you mean the Danish government? Well they just followed Danish law and left the newspaper in peace although they might not have liked the caricatures. You must mean then the Danish Parliament since they did not have made laws before that forbid these kinds of pictures because they humiliate some people. Who did he suit really? My question might seem ridiculous but I think just by saying "sui the danes" you do just like GW Bush: punish the whole group for sth that a minority did. And Sadat, is it to build brides to call the other side rascists and therefore refuse to talk to them as prof Hafez writes..?
2008-03-05 16:29 Sadat wrote:
The most important point in this article as I see it, is that the writer tries to build bridges with the other. How many of those who read this article or others on the same road, did make the effort to cross this bridge to try to understand, and thereby make peace? That is the question that I see very vital here
2008-03-04 12:46 Ghandi wrote:
Well, val1000001, do you know that a Copt is suing the Danes for republishing the Cartoons? He is an Egyptian citizen, but Chritian. Somthing else: When I´m talking about how Copts received Muslims in Egypt, I´m talking about the whole Picture. Of course there has been wrong doings, here or there. But the overall picture was great, especailly in comparison to Romans! Also, read again about Taha Hussein! As for Nasr Hamed Abu Zeid, I agree with you. I do support Nasser Abu Zeid and his cause! We as Muslims, are not all one, as any people are, and please don´t define me with the terorist Muslims, since as the definition goes, they are not Muslims, once they kill and destroy. Islam is peace, and try to read the old books of Islam. You agree with old Muslim books, and in the end you stand against Islam? That is a schizophrenia my friend! Have one stand and defend it!
2008-03-04 09:33 vlad100001 wrote:
actully everybody free to do what he wanna do but muslims refuse this point they consider that anybody difference with them is there enemy and they must kill him ,what you said about that copts welcomed the muslims to get ride from romanian persecution is totally wrong and don´t say it´s wrote in history because you read and talk about the history you wanna say and talk about it.read to Sanna Almasary or Taha Hussein or Nasr Hamid Abozaid and there is more than this from the honest people plus this there books is according to early islamic writters books like Abn Kather ,Abn Khaldon and many others ,why muslims trying to cheat all the world ?why they refuse to admit that islam is religion of violence and based on Blood of the people
2008-03-03 23:43 Ghandi wrote:
Alexander, read history, dear sir. Mohamed didn´t expand Islam by the sword. You might ask the Copts and tell them, what happened in Egypt after Islam entered. However, that was after Mohamed died. But they used to suffer by the Romans before Islam entered Egypt. Actually, the Copts helped Amr Ibn El Ass enter Egypt. That is history and not my opinion! Also, the region that was, at the time, was all prepared to attack the new state. Wars against the neigbors were in defense and not as attacks per se. At the time, war was a norm! It was the building of a nation. I would love that you read the history and not listen to your media. Since today´s media is incredibly politicised. I doubt you are an Islamic studies specialist. Thanks and sending you all my respect
2008-03-03 17:34 Alexander T Darwin- UK wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong. Didn´t Islam, in the 7th century AD, onwards ( ie in the days when prophet mohammed was the leader), spread by the sword? Didn´t Arab armies occupy and colonialise the area north of Arabia, Egypt, North Africa, Spain etc. Will today´s Muslims then, accept this fact, and apologise for slaughtering Egyptians, Berber, Persians, etc and accept that they were colonisors? Then perhaps we in Europe can accept that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was a peace-loving prophet, NOT the leader of advancing armies to establish an empire?
2008-03-03 11:48 Manahel El-Marsafi wrote:
This article is a turning point, since the whole object is about the Double Standards in Europe. We, Muslims respect all religion as is said in the Quran. God, gave us all freedom, even the DEVIL to act as he wishes!!! It is our mind that diferentiates between the freedom of "reason" and the freedom of the DEVIL! That of the devils, gives freedom for desire, and hence instigates wars. That is the Danish Cartoon issue! The good thing here, is that the writer, attacks also radical Muslims, between the lines. He said loud and clearly that there are bad Muslims, and attacked Bin Laden, as well as defining evil with Bin Laden! I see a great "lack" of understanding here! What we reached of civilization, enforces us to read rather than go after "desires of the Devil"!
2008-03-03 11:32 Ghandi wrote:
Hi Kerolos, you are talking about religions. THe point in the Denmark is not religion at all! It is about freedom! The article states an important point: Why doesn´t the Denmark give the President of Iran the right to say what he wants about the holocost? Here is the point: Double standards!
2008-03-03 09:50 Kerolos kamal wrote:
Perhaps we should see this problem from another point of view. what I am going to say does not mean at all that I agree with what happened but let´s think differently: all the films, cartoons and books that were published like Da vinci Code, Jesus Christ Super star, ..... and there is of course a long list of these all were aiming to insult Christianity and Christian symbols. here is the big question who did this? the answer is some people who lived in the western countries, some of them are or were Christians. the western people from what I found is " they respect the right of anyone to believe but they are not forced to respect his belief" final conclusion: it wasn´t a religious problem but it was a problem of readjusting definitions.
2008-03-03 09:26 nadiahimam@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that the writer disregarded that, loudly, every imam in every mosque in every country after every pray despises all non Muslims specially the Jews begging the God to burn them
2008-03-03 03:09 George Bush wrote:
Thanks Joe for the advice! I respect people who are against porn. But I have the right to have full nasty intercourse infront of your Queen Margret II´s palace and especially infront of her terrace! That is what you say! Also in the end I´m George Bush, and no one can stop me! That is real freedom man! Thanks! You made me understand freedom real good!
2008-03-03 01:35 Joe wrote:
The right to believe does not mean that others should feel any reason to respect that belief. I respect the right of believers to believe. I do not respect the things they believe in.
2008-03-02 08:20 Johan Bressendorff wrote:
If you don´t believe in freedom of expression for people you despise, you don´t believe in it at all.
2008-03-02 04:41 Ibrahim Attia wrote:
civilized ..... respecting ..... i hope they can listen to us befor it´s too late .
2008-03-01 22:19 Ahmed Attiya wrote:
"You chose collective punishment of more than a "billion" of people"و I totally agree with this statement. it keeps happening over and over again USA fought and still fighting wars with afghanistan and Iraq because of 9/11, and Israel attacked lebanon because two soldiers were kidnapped.It´s not a matter of reaction as it is a matter of total distruction, that´s what i would say ...double standard judgment as you said, i hope their public opinion realise it one day.
2008-03-01 19:46 Rasha Olama wrote:
Amazingly enough, I always thought that Europe was cultured and civilized, seems like I´ve been only stupid. Freedom of faith, of thought, of speech and that of media is only fictive, phony. I always believed all these were strong values that came along with respect to the other. Can´t see any trace of that nowaways. Where is the diversity, accepting all that is different and respecting it? this was never true, diversity was only about us accepting you, but never the other way round. We do in fact accept others and we do respect them, I never ever saw an Arab, regardless of Moselm of Christian, do this. It´s not even ethical. I´ll never ever believe any of this crab again, never. Just saw the film adapted from George Crile´s 2003 book Charlie Wilson´s War: The Extraordinary Story of the Largest Covert Operation in History. Any clue? Julia Roberts in her role as Joanne herring states: I´m Christian myself, but I´m defending those moslems for their right of belief, their freedom. They have the right to believe what they want and this is what I´m defending. Hoep I made myself clear.


Write a comment

For the time being it is not possible to post comments.


Latest headlines

Question
Jobs in Sweden
ADVERT:
Stockholm Calendar
Reader's comment
Private ads