News
Photo: Joakim Lind

Debate about ´women only´ in public swimming halls

Stockholm | 2011-11-04 | 9 comments
The city of Stockholm is planning to reserve more hours in the city’s swimming halls for women. The reason is to give women who cannot swim together with men due to religious belief, an opportunity to use the facilities.


Print Print article

ADVERT:

In Tensta, a suburb in northern Stockholm with many immigrants, the swimming hall has for a few years reserved one afternoon a week for women only. The result has been very good in terms of numbers of visitors. Now there are plans to increase the hours when men are banned at the swimming hall.

Studies show that the ability to swim has increased among those women who visit the swimming hall during these hours. In 2009; 29 % of them could swim 200 meters breast stroke. In 2011; the number was 36 %. To increase the physical activity among the Stockholmers is also the main reason behind the whole idea. Many of the women who come to the hall during these hours are very happy with being able to swim without the presence of men. According to a survey from the city, many Muslim women would not exercise at all if it was not for the reserved ‘women hours’ at the swimming halls.

But there are also many critics; for example Per Ström at the think tank Den Nya Välfärden (the New Welfare) who said to the public service radio station Sr:
“Publically finances institutions must be characterized by equality. It is a very basic principle”
 

Readers' comments

2011-11-12 02:11 AB wrote:
Separated swimming pool it is a good idea for all.
2011-11-09 12:26 Katie wrote:
Public services MUST treat all persons equally. If Muslim women are uncomfortable swimming with men, there are plenty of other exercises they can do to get/stay in shape. Obese women may be uncomfortable, too, and do other types of exercising.
2011-11-09 12:22 Katie wrote:
Unless the government is willing to provide for "men only" times, they should NOT be providing "women Only" times. To provide "Women Only" times based on a "want" based on tradition (nowhere does Islam direct that men and women should swim separately!) under the guise that it is based on a religious "need" is a slippery slope, indeed. What public service will be targeted next?
2011-11-07 11:33 Balkis Aghali wrote:
When Women live in Sweden chose to swim separately not with men it is their own wish and desire and we have to respect that
2011-11-07 09:26 Tim wrote:
Public services are there to provide services the public will use. If attendance has been good in these times, clearly there is a public demand, and so it should be provided.
2011-11-05 13:24 Alberto wrote:
50% men and 50% women
2011-11-05 12:35 nora wrote:
It should be a joke! Accepting ignorance by giving a ground to that?
2011-11-05 09:48 Me wrote:
Religions should not have anything to do with government policy. That´s a very slippery slope...
2011-11-04 20:35 Ahmed wrote:
I think that Per Ström is absolutely right. I came from a Muslim country where the men and women are separated in swimming pool and other similar situations. I think this kind of places should not be funded by government since we will face more separated society after a while.


Write a comment

For the time being it is not possible to post comments.


Latest headlines

Question
Jobs in Sweden
ADVERT:
Stockholm Calendar
Reader's comment
Private ads